B. Shelton
To Win
M. Navone
To Win
Mariano Navone vs Ethan Quinn Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W L W L W
Form
W L W L W W L W W WH2H: Navone 0 - 0 Quinn
| Navone | Stats | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (12-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (25-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 85 | Ranking | 119 |
| 29 | Highest Rank | 119 |
| 24 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 4 |
| 62% (235-146) | Career Total W/L | 59% (113-79) |
| $786,850 | Career Prize Money | $356,615 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mariano Navone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Mariano Navone
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Mariano Navone
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
0-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
43%
(
52 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
115
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Mariano Navone
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
76
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Mariano Navone
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Laslo Djere
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Mariano Navone
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
78)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ethan Quinn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Dusan Lajovic
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
49%
(
57 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
12
Aces
6
10
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
55 of
71)
58%
(
34 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
40 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
111
Total Points Won
114
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Billy Harris
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Ethan Quinn
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Borna Coric
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Corentin Moutet
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
Ethan Quinn
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Jordan Thompson
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Ethan Quinn
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (235/146) | Win/Loss | 59% (113/79) |
| 59% (532/371) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (254/201) |
| 54% (4578/3975) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2351/2164) |
| 33% (8/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (70/47) |
| 65% (225/121) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (14/13) |
| 29% (2/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (27/17) |
| 0% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.41 |
| 364 | Aces Total | 915 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 953 | Total Double Faults | 520 |
| 1:40:18 | Average Match Time | 1:47:39 |
| 309.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 334.94 |
| 66% (15329/23187) | 1st Serve % | 60% (8380/14007) |
| 62% (9515/15329) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (5957/8380) |
| 48% (3798/7858) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2849/5627) |
| 47% (1386/2955) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (514/1292) |
| 45% (10842/23863) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5369/13936) |
| 20% (2/8) | Slam W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 36% (5/9) | Masters W/L | 75% (9/3) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (25/22) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (10/13) |
| 66% (75/38) | Challenger W/L | 55% (51/41) |
| 65% (126/67) | Futures W/L | 69% (40/18) |
| 62% (229/371) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (112/189) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (51/94) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (43/78) |
| 54% (71/132) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (43/72) |
| 84% (229/192) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (108/94) |
| 16% (229/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (108/14) |
| 28% (152/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (84/19) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
